Cases 21 - 30 of 624
Carabalz v. Ping
as 3:2023cv03058
Plaintiff:
Junior Alberto Valencia Carabalz
Defendant:
Acting Warden L. Ping
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Manzo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv02449
Plaintiff:
Marc A Manzo
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Officer Johnson, Officer Valencia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Board of County Commissioners
as 1:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valencia
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
United States v. Villa-Valencia
as 23-3205
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LUIS VILLA-VALENCIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Pena v. Juarez et al
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Pena
Defendant:
J. Juarez and J. Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia-Adata v. F C I Oakdale II
as 2:2023cv01164
Plaintiff:
Cruz Eduardo Valencia-Adata
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valencia v. Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Valencia
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners, Metropolitan Detention Center, Jason Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Perez-Valencia v. Warden
as 1:2023cv01123
Petitioner:
Mayel Perez-Valencia
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arturo Valencia Barrera v. People of the State of California Probation
as 23-55629
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTURO OSIEL VALENCIA BARRERA
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROBATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
