Cases 21 - 30 of 107
Rodriguez v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2021cv08565
Plaintiff:
Modesto Rodriguez
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, Warden Steven Bastian, Officer Michelle Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTOLI v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2021cv02195
Plaintiff:
ERIC BARTOLI
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, JEFFERY M. OLSON, JOHN R. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotman v. Doe et al
as 2:2021cv00160
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving, Jane Doe and J. Doe
Plaintiff:
David M. Trotman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bracken v. Lopez et al
as 1:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Bracken
Defendant:
Audra De Santos, Carol Trujillo, Antoinette Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olatuwan v. Ofagh, et al.
as 3:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Ofagh, Dixie Delutis, Levar Stoney and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem Akeem Olatuwan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2020ct03325
Plaintiff:
Jermell Crawford
Defendant:
Antoinette Faulcon, Billy Cooper, Jodie Penny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodroffe v. Irwing et al
as 1:2020cv01192
Defendant:
Sgt. Gomez, Major A Ames and Antoinette V Irwing
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Woodroffe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gail v. Irving
as 3:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Antoinette Irving
Plaintiff:
Devrick Gail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purvis-Mitchell v. Bacon et al
as 9:2020cv01224
Respondent:
Craig Apple, Antoinette T. Bacon and Director of United States Marshal Service
Petitioner:
Tyler Purvis-Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
