Cases 21 - 30 of 633
Fakih v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Abdallah Fakih
Respondent:
H. Barron and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schmitt v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01677
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hubbert v. Dixon et al
as 2:2023cv14272
Plaintiff:
Joshua M. Hubbert
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, Ms. Barron, Mr. Kenny Brinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Escobar v. Irby et al
as 2:2023cv01740
Plaintiff:
Michael D Escobar
Defendant:
Irene Barron Irby, Unknown Navarro, Unknown Raymer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Cargill v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01304
Petitioner:
Quincetta Yvonne Cargill
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Barron v. The Village of Bronxville et al
as 7:2023cv07364
Plaintiff:
Miguel Barron
Defendant:
The Village of Bronxville, The Village of Bronxville Police Department, Matthew S. Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Xochitl Padilla-Barron v. Warden
as 2:2023cv06461
Petitioner:
Xochitl Padilla-Brown and Xochitl Padilla-Barron
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
