Cases 21 - 30 of 320
Murzike v. Knox et al
as 3:2023cv01125
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Tifani S. Knox, Richard J. Andrews, R.D. Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lancaster v. Ayers et al
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derric Lancaster
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv03866
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Robinson
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E Cuevas, G Khakh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Uhuru v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv01321
Plaintiff:
Diallo Earl Uhuru and Kohen Diallo E. Uhuru
Defendant:
Daniel E. Cueva, G Khaku, Mr. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Bradford v. Ron Broomfield
as 23-99005
Petitioner:
MARK ALAN BRADFORD
Respondent:
RON BROOMFIELD, Warden
Hickson v. Broomfield
as 1:2023cv03233
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Hickson
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Grant v. Ronald Broomfield
as 23-55605
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD BROOMFIELD
Broomfield v. Martin
as 1:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Franklin Broomfield
Defendant:
Leroy Martin and Sheriff Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
