Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Averille Willis v. J. Reynoso, et al
as 17-15365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AVERILLE WILLIS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. REYNOSO, M. CARRASQUILLO, C. RAMOS and others
Willis v. Reynoso, et al.
as 1:2015cv01741
Plaintiff:
Averille Willis
Defendant:
J Reynoso, M Carrasquillo, C. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv01699
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
S. Smith, Coffin, C. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Smith et al
as 1:2015cv01430
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Respondent:
S. Smith, Coffin, C. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Navarro v. Keller et al
as 5:2013cv00771
Defendant:
Brennan K. Gill, Marcus R. Keller, Sergio R. Montes and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Navarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2013cv03785
Plaintiff:
Terrance Hamilton, Charlie Lee Million and Devon Davis
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roettgen v. Foston et al
as 3:2013cv01101
Plaintiff:
John Roettgen
Defendant:
D. Foston, R. Briggs, G. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. HOLDER
as 1:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
RAUL C. RAMOS
Defendant:
ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Williams, Jr. v. C. Ramos, et al
as 13-55018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE CLARK WILLIAMS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
C. RAMOS, Correctional Sergeant, J. EUSTICE, Correctional Officer, M. LEE, Correctional Officer and others
Williams v. Perez et al
as 5:2012cv01691
Plaintiff:
James Edward Williams
Defendant:
R. Perez, C. Ramos, J. Juarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
