Cases 21 - 30 of 400
Williams v. Winfrey
as 1:2023cv01091
Plaintiff:
Charles Williams
Defendant:
Reginald L. Winfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 2:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, ERICK HELENIHI, CHRISTOPHER WHITMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Williams
as 1:2023cv00369
Petitioner:
Scotty M. Brown
Respondent:
Charles Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Sterling et al
as 2:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Davanta T. Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Sterling, Mr. Charles Williams, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Brokaw et al
as 9:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Larry A. White
Defendant:
Matthew Brokaw, Steven Fleshman, Bryan Stirling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Johnson v. Trabue
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles William Johnson
Defendant:
Officer Trabue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Nesbit v. Stirling et al
as 5:2022cv04699
Plaintiff:
Henry Nesbit
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Joel Anderson, Willie Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Deyton v. S.C.D.C. et al
as 9:2022cv04748
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Deyton
Defendant:
S.C.D.C., Nurse R. Cook, Amy Enloe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
White v. Stirling et al
as 9:2022cv04638
Plaintiff:
Larry Anthony White
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Charles Williams, Daniel Harouff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv03605
Plaintiff:
CARLESE J. HALL
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, PATRICIA V. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
