Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Robinson v. Ford et al
as 8:2020cv03626
Plaintiff:
Chad Robinson
Defendant:
Tiffany Campbell, Trionda Mungo, James Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. Brown et al
as 3:2020cv02077
Defendant:
Ricky L. Morse, Pam Haynesworth, Robert D. Beckford, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Noble Saquan Tarkee El Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2020cv00959
Plaintiff:
Arkein Campbell
Defendant:
Katelyn Arnold, City of North Charleston, Eddie Driggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dennis et al
as 3:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Pam Haynesworth, James C. Campbell, Allen Jackson-Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brown v. Dennis et al
as 3:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Randall K Stewart, Bryan Keith Griffin, Pam Haynesworth and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Campbell
as 6:2019cv03564
Plaintiff:
Bradley Alan Ross
Defendant:
Deputy Joshua P Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spells et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv03217
Defendant:
Edward Staggers, Leshawn June, Richard Cothran and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Spells and Julia Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollard v. Campbell et al
as 3:2019cv02992
Defendant:
James C. Campbell and Bryan Keith Griffin
Plaintiff:
Parrish Rayquan Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morant v. Dodson et al
as 3:2019cv02930
Defendant:
Deputy Clerk James C. Campbell, Ronald L. Dodson, Jr., Bonds Man Vanessa Moyer and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Rodriguez Morant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Morant v. People of the State of South Carolina, The et al
as 3:2019cv02849
Defendant:
Sumter County, People of the State of South Carolina, The, Deputy Clerk James C. Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Rodriguez Morant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
