Cases 21 - 30 of 32
CLARK v. FARRELL et al
as 2:2013cv04850
Petitioner:
CHARLES CLARK
Respondent:
FARRELL, CHRIS WOGAN, PENN. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv02234
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CLARK
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv20520
Plaintiff:
Charles Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Clark v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00099
Petitioner:
Charles Clark
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv00235
Petitioner:
Charles Clark
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Hester v. Webster County Sheriff's, et al
as 10-60516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
WEBSTER COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, PHILIP SMITH, Webster County Sheriff, MIKE PERRIGAN, Probation Officer and others
Charles Clark v. Exec Office of the US Attorney, et al
as 09-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Executive Office of the United States Attorneys, EOUSA/FOIA/PA UNIT and Office of Information and Privacy, U.S. Department of Justice
Hester v. Webster County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Hester
Defendant:
Webster County Sheriff's Department, Philip Smith, Mike Perrigan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Charles Clark v. Kathy Prosper et al
as 2:2008cv03848
Petitioner:
Charles Clark
Respondent:
Kathy Prosper and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v. Prosper et al
as 3:2008cv00989
Petitioner:
Charles Clark
Respondent:
Kathy Prosper and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
