Cases 21 - 30 of 124
Sterling Singleton v. Bryan Stirling
as 22-6571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STERLING L. SINGLETON
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of SCDC, DENNIS PATTERSON, Director of Operations, WILLIE DAVIS, Regional Director and others
Singleton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Sterling L Singleton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Singleton v. SCDC et al
as 9:2021cv03820
Plaintiff:
Sterling L. Singleton
Defendant:
SCDC, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banner v. Anderson et al
as 6:2021cv03738
Plaintiff:
Genuine Truth Banner
Defendant:
Joel Anderson, Joseph Stines, Dennis Patterson, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Stirling et al
as 4:2021cv03797
Plaintiff:
Chavis Cox and Chavis Laranzo Cox
Defendant:
Bryan Stirling, Joel Anderson, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwin v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01537
Defendant:
Emily Anderson, Michael McCall, Sam Ray and others
Plaintiff:
Hakeem Edwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01538
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Michael McCall, Emily Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Shaw v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01105
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01106
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Shadrian Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01107
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Uniqueqa James, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jenkins and Deloris Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
