Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Rodriguez v. Commonwealth of Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00845
Respondent: Virginia Commonwealth of and Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner: Daniel Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodriguez v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2019cv00756
Petitioner: Daniel Rodriguez, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Rodriguez v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-11438
Petitioner - Appellant: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
: AT&T and CINGULAR WIRELESS, LLC
Harris v. Hypta et al
as 1:2018cv02016
Plaintiff: Anthony Harris, Charmaine Renfro, Ashunti Finley and others
Defendant: Szymon Hypta, Richard Gallegos, James Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Daniel Rodriguez
as 17-3835
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez v. Graham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv03395
Respondent: Superintendent H. Graham
Petitioner: Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Punke et al
as 1:2017cv01161
Plaintiff: Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant: Scott A Punke, Buchenau, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10427
Plaintiff: Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant: Wexford Health Source Inc., Saleh Obaisi and Wendy Olsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv24253
Plaintiff: DANIEL RODRIGUEZ
Defendant: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez v USA
as 1:2016cv01500
Defendant: Daniel Rodriguez and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?