Cases 21 - 30 of 107
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v Unknown Defendants
as 3:2018cv00628
Plaintiff:
Carlos Scott
Defendant:
Laura Roberts, Timmy Ducote, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections
as 3:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Roy Adams, Unknown Barkemyer, Trent Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clay Riggs v. Crawford Jordan, et al
as 18-30233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAY LANDIS RIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAWFORD JORDAN, SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT WINN PARISH, JACKSON PARISH CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
King v. Toce et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Defendant:
Jane Doe L. Ducote, James M. LeBlanc and Paul Toce
Plaintiff:
Raymond King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaudet v. Ducote et al
as 2:2017cv12139
Plaintiff:
Quincy Gaudet
Defendant:
Warden Ducote
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gaudet v. Ducote et al
as 3:2017cv00894
Respondent:
Unknown Ducote and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Quincy Gaudet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dregin v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center et al
as 3:2017cv01303
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dregin
Defendant:
Jackson Parish Correctional Center, Andy Brown, Timothy Ducote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Louisiana et al
as 1:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
Phillip Anthony Page
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Cranford Jordan, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goff v. 8th Judicial District Court et al
as 3:2017cv00829
Plaintiff:
Marcus Goff
Defendant:
8th Judicial District Court, Cranford Jordan, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
