Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Eric Michael Gravel v. Jack Fox
as 2:2015cv04073
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Gravel
Cheek v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv01114
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Cheek
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS") et al
as 0:2015cv01573
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services ("MDHS"), Minnesota Sex Offender Program ("MSOP"), Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. United States Of America
as 7:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Garcia
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Eric Michael Gravel v. Chris J. Ulrich et al
as 2:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Gravel
Defendant:
C. Huntington, E. Ricolcol, Chris J. Ulrich and others
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv04193
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, Lucinda Jesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Office of the Minnesota Attorney General et al
as 0:2014cv02929
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Office of the Minnesota Attorney General, Lori Swanson, Aaron Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sorenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
as 0:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Sorenson
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, The Institute For Psychological & Sexual Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gravel v. Babcock
as 2:2014cv00012
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Gravel
Respondent:
Mike Babcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brown v. United States
as 1:2013cv04015
Petitioner:
Eric Michael Brown
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
