Cases 21 - 30 of 581
Simpson v. Roda
as 13-2571
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodore Simpson
Defendant - Appellee:
P. A. Rodas, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Ben Oakes, South Port Correctional Facility, C. Felker, South Port Correctional Facility and others
Simpson v. Roda
as 13-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodore Simpson
Defendant - Appellee:
P. A. Rodas, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Ben Oakes, South Port Correctional Facility, C. Felker, South Port Correctional Facility and others
McKeag v. Kautzky et al
as 4:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
Joel Patrick McKeag
Defendant:
Walter L Kautzky, Gary Maynard, John R Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mark Morgan v. Jerry Bartruff, et al
as 13-1828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark D. Morgan
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerry Bartruff, Gail Huckins, Kelli Collins and others
Ronald Jackson v. T. Felker, et al
as 12-17746
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD D. JACKSON
Respondent - Appellee:
T. FELKER and D. K. SISTO, Warden
Johnson v. Felker et al
as 2:2012cv02719
Plaintiff:
Maurice Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Felker, Matthew Cate, Mike McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosales -v- Fisher, et al.,
as 6:2012cv06563
Plaintiff:
Luis Rosales
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Lester N. Wright, Carl J. Koengsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Rodas et al
as 9:2012cv01482
Plaintiff:
Theodore Simpson
Defendant:
Rodas, Ben Oakes , C. Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Malik Jones v. J. Bishop, et al
as 12-16732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALIK JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. BISHOP, R. STOVALL, LIPTON and others
Michael Chess v. J. Dovey, et al
as 12-16516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHESS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. DOVEY, Director of Corrections, ABUL, Doctor of the CDC, MIDGE MILLER, Nurse Practitioner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
