Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Graham v. Hurst et al
as 5:2013ct03109
Plaintiff:
James R. Graham
Defendant:
Stephen Hurst, Carol Hill and Ernest Forrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WRAY v. SAUNDER et al
as 1:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
JOHN LEWIS WRAY, JR.
Defendant:
SORELL SAUNDER, PAT MCCRORY, ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez-Valdez v. O'Malley et al
as 3:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Mendez-Valdez
Defendant:
Thomas O'Malley, Kimberly Y. Best, Denzil H. Forrester and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Bridges et al
as 3:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Forrest D. Bridges, Christian Hoel, Andrew Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Curran et al
as 5:2013ct03037
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Martha H. Curran, Andrew Murray, Christian Hoel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tart v. Kornegay et al
as 5:2011ct03236
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Tart
Defendant:
Joyce Kornegay, Forrest Festerman, Janitorial Products Plant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Branker et al
as 5:2011ct03071
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James
Defendant:
G. J. Branker, North Carolina Department of Correction, North Carolina Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wray v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2010cv00298
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Wray, Jr.
Defendant:
R. David Mitchell, Beverly Perdue, Roy Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Bridges et al
as 3:2010cv00635
Petitioner:
Steve Morrison
Respondent:
Forrest D. Bridges, Christa Cox and Bruce Lillie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Forrester v. Snyder
as 5:2007hc02080
Petitioner:
Charles E. Forrester, Jr.
Respondent:
George E. Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
