Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Ray v. Amerson et al
as 1:2014cv01839
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Franklin Carter Allen and Zack Vines
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glen Byars, Jr. v. William Stephens, Director
as 14-50502
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLEN EDWARD BYARS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv14130
Plaintiff:
Glen Edward Hall
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00178
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Hall
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glen Edward Rogers v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv02509
Respondent:
Los Angeles County and State of California
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Rogers
Byars v. Thaler
as 5:2013cv00189
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Byars, Jr.
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glen Mathews v. Warden
as 12-10366
Petitioner - Appellant:
GLEN EDWARD MATHEWS
Respondent - Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - LOW WARDEN
Rogers v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2011cv02221
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Rogers
Respondent:
State Of Florida and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glen Edward Rutherford v. Gary Swarthout
as 5:2011cv01089
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Rutherford
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Mathews v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2010cv00366
Petitioner:
Glen Edward Mathews
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
