Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Gardner v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Bullock Correctional Facility, Gwendolyn Babers and others
Plaintiff:
Corey J. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Bullock v. Warden, et al
as 18-10962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE BULLOCK, a.k.a. Maurice Terrance Bullock
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, GWENDOLYN BABERS, Capt., EDWARD KERN, Dr. and others
Bullock v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00638
Plaintiff:
Maurice Bullock
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones , Rene Mason , Gwendolyn Babers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shirey v. Giles, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Justin Blake Shirey
Defendant:
Sandra Giles and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00210
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Pedehel P. Martin, Benton Wayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Babers, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers, Rene Mason, B. Robbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Babers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00373
Plaintiff:
Dyron Smith
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Babers , Kenneth Sconyers , Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petite v. Hetzel (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Isadore Petite
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lawson, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00621
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Nathaniel Lawson, Gwendolyn Babers, S. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Gary Hetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
