Cases 21 - 30 of 89
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
ELLIS v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
KEITH ELLIS
Defendant:
M. ROBERTS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, T. PICTOUROUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUNLAP v. PLATT et al
as 1:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
DANNY THOMAS DUNLAP
Defendant:
CHRIS PLATT, SEVIZZI and KEITH HARTZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., TRICIA PRETORTIOUS, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODARD v. PLATT et al
as 1:2022cv02345
Plaintiff:
DONTE' WOODARD
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, TRICIA PRETORIUS, JASON SERUIZZI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUZIER v. JAFFE et al
as 1:2022cv02302
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL ROUZIER
Defendant:
B. JAFFE, CORIZON, ALFA FINOTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT v. FRANKLIN et al
as 1:2022cv02244
Plaintiff:
KEITH LEE BRYANT
Defendant:
ANDREA FRANKLIN, CONSTANCE SCHMITT, KEITH HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HOTEP-EL v. CARTER et al
as 2:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, T. PHEGLEY and T. HARTZELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. FRANCO et al
as 1:2022cv00880
Plaintiff:
DONTE CURRY
Defendant:
MIGUEL FRANCO, WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES INC., CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
