Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Lee v. Holland et al
as 7:2012cv03855
Petitioner:
Demetrius Lamar Lee
Respondent:
Holland, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drullat v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2012cv00797
Plaintiff:
Mario Robertino Drullat
Defendant:
Nurse Riley, Dr. Warr, Lt. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2012cv00687
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Davidson
Defendant:
Sharon McSwain-Holland, Jesse Youngblood and James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Russell County Sheriff Department et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Clyde H. Friend
Defendant:
Russell County Sheriff Department, Russell County Jail, Heath Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holland v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv08009
Petitioner:
Charles Nathan Holland
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Differ v. Holland (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Differ
Defendant:
Michael Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flournoy v. McSwain-Holland et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Donnell Flournoy
Defendant:
Skip Duffie , Lori Ingram , Doug Valeska and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bankston v. Haddock et al
as 5:2011cv02040
Plaintiff:
Barbara L Hampton Jones Bankston
Defendant:
Steve Haddock, Julie Reynolds, Paul Holland and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Holland et al
as 2:2010cv01672
Petitioner:
Ismail Hakim Malik Shabazz
Respondent:
Sharon McSwain Holland and Attorney General of State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Holland et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00035
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lamar Hall
Defendant:
CO I Holland, CO I Fleming and M. Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
