Cases 21 - 30 of 78
Hunt v. Champaign County Court et al
as 2:2022cv02040
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Champaign County Court, State Attorneys, Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. County of Champaign Illinois et al
as 2:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
County of Champaign Illinois, Wellpath to Hope and Healing, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. Thompson et al
as 3:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Clarence R. Williamson, III and Mark Howard
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, Daniel Monti, Cassandra Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv06635
Plaintiff:
Karlton K. Brown
Defendant:
Warden Gomez, NRC Record Office, Counselor Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50459
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, J. Hess, J. Leonowicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Securus Technologies Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02272
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Securus Technologies Inc, Robert Pickins, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv03235
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Ciolli et al
as 3:2021cv50156
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hunt
Defendant:
Kruger, J. Leonowicz, A. Ciolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv05166
Plaintiff:
Markus Crawford
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Chicago Police Dept. and Mr. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
