Cases 21 - 30 of 91
MCGEE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2021cv01959
Plaintiff:
RANDY MCGEE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ALBERTO COLLENTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00956
Defendant:
RIVER CITY POLYGRAPH, INDIANAPOLIS COUNSELING CENTER, LIBERTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE et al v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2020cv00586
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., G.M. HORTH, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2020cv00514
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUARLES v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2020cv00465
Petitioner:
DAMON QUARLES
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARRIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv01165
Plaintiff:
BARDLEY J. HARRIS and BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Defendant:
CONTRACTORS OF THE INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2019cv00608
Respondent:
CURTIS HILL, JR., INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner:
ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEYBA v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2019cv00226
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, WARDEN and ERIC HOLCOMB
Petitioner:
ERWIN LEYBA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cantu v. Department of Justice et al
as 3:2019cv00355
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cantu, Sr and Tony Cantu
Defendant:
Crawford, French, Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. NOBBLIT et al
as 4:2019cv00068
Defendant:
MIKE FEECE, JUSTIN NOBBLIT, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON DAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
