Cases 21 - 30 of 80
Walsh v. Fink et al
as 1:2014cv06966
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Walsh
Defendant:
Deputy Chief Fink, Chris Repsis, Timothy Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walsh v. The Native Village of Tanana et al
as 4:2014cv00020
Petitioner:
William J. Walsh
Respondent:
The Native Village of Tanana, Curtis Sommer and Tribal Council Members
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Donald B. Williams v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv06539
Defendant:
Judge Andrew J Guilford, Judge Andrew J Guilford, The United States of America, - and others
Plaintiff:
Donald B Williams
MOSLEY v. WALSH et al
as 1:2014cv01507
Petitioner:
Darsean Mosley
Respondent:
J. Walsh, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walsh v. Kaluzny Brother's Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03412
Plaintiff:
Derek J. Walsh
Defendant:
Kaluzny Brother's Inc., Robert Kaluzny, Thomas George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOSLEY v. WALSH et al
as 2:2014cv02648
Petitioner:
DARSEAN MOSLEY
Respondent:
J. WALSH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYCOMING and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. The United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv01686
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Williams
Defendant:
The United States of America, Andrew J. Guilford and Patrick J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. CORBETT et al
as 3:2014cv00598
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Pittman
Defendant:
Jon Wetzel and J. Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Phillips
as 14-768
Petitioner - Appellant:
George Mims
Respondent - Appellee:
William Phillips and James J. Walsh
Donald B. Williams v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv01463
Defendant:
Does, Andrew J. Guilford, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and others
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Williams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
