Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Muldrow v. Page et al
as 5:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Elbert Muldrow
Defendant:
Bob Page, LaSalle Corrections, James Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muldrow v. Page et al
as 5:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Elbert Muldrow
Defendant:
Bob Page, FNU Charpentier, LaSalle Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuart v. Prince et al
as 5:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Myron Stuart
Defendant:
James Prince and Bob Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rigsby v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamar Rigsby
Defendant:
B Jones, FNU Tuttle, LaSalle Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Prince et al
as 5:2014cv00047
Plaintiff:
Brian Williams
Defendant:
James Prince, Page, Chaplain Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Mathews v. Bowie County, Texas, et al
as 13-41307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY DON MATHEWS
Defendant - Appellee:
BOWIE COUNTY TEXAS, JAMES PRINCE, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS, INCORPORATED and others
Muckleroy V. Stephens, et al
as 5:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Reginald Carl Muckleroy
Defendant:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID, Ralph K Burgess, Jerry D Rochelle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amen-Ra v. Williams et al
as 5:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
Akili Sadiki Amen-Ra
Defendant:
Don Williams, John Doe Panel Members of the United States Parol Commission, Thomas Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lafayette v. Prince et al
as 5:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lafayette, Jr
Defendant:
James Prince, Texarkana Texas Police Chief, FNU Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amen-Ra v. Williams et al
as 4:2012cv04130
Plaintiff:
Akili Sadiki Amen-Ra
Defendant:
Don Williams, John Doe Panel Members of the United States Parol Commission, Thomas Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
