Cases 21 - 30 of 137
Dugas et al v. UTMB Hospital Galveston et al
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Dugas and Patrick Strong
Defendant:
UTMB Hospital Galveston, The State of Texas, Jester 4 Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Jester
as 1:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Walter Brinson
Respondent:
Warden Gregory Sampson and Teketa Jester
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 4:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Liebl v. Jester et al
as 1:2023cv01131
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hans Liebl
Defendant:
David Jester and F Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOLDEN v. JESTER
as 5:2023cv00310
Petitioner:
BRANDON BOLDEN
Respondent:
WARDEN T JESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Liebl v. Jester et al
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Jesse Hans Liebl
Defendant:
David Jester and F Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cullum v. Hammond et al
as 1:2023cv01231
Plaintiff:
Detrick Cullum
Defendant:
Brian Hammond, Jason L Jester and . Schoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roger Sims-Bey v. Jason Jester, et al
as 23-1779
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROGER SIMS-BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON JESTER, JUSTIN HAMMERS, CERRYLE HINTHORNE and others
Jester v. State of Delaware
as 1:2023cv00339
Petitioner:
John L. Jester
Respondent:
State Of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merryfield v. Fleet et al
as 5:2023cv03041
Plaintiff:
Dustin J. Merryfield
Defendant:
Kelsey Fleet, Jason Jester, Xan Bowersox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
