Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Crump v. John Doe 1-4 et al
as 5:2022ct03231
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Crump
Defendant:
John Doe 1-4, Regina Hooks and Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUMP v. JOHN DOE 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY CRUMP
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Buncombe County Jail Doctor et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Charles Jordan
Defendant:
Buncombe County Jail Doctor, Asheville Police, Buncombe County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCain v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03018
Plaintiff:
John McCain, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Mr. Jones, Mr. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCALLISTER v. FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, ROCKY JOYNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Langley et al
as 5:2021ct03286
Plaintiff:
Dwain C. Ferrell
Defendant:
Valerie Langley and John Doe 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schulz v. John Does 1-3 et al
as 3:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Bernard Schulz
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE. ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE IN CASE 5:21-CT-3270-D Edwards v. Hooks et al
as 5:2021cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tracey Edwards
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Benita J. Witherspoon, Claudette Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Hooks et al
as 5:2021ct03270
Plaintiff:
Tracey Edwards
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Benita J. Witherspoon, Claudette Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
