Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Hilliard v. Illinois Department of Corr et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Hilliard
Defendant:
James Luth and John Does #1 and #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alli v. Security Officer Pedlar et al
as 1:2014cv10257
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Security Officer Pedlar, Security Officer Bravo, Security Officer Almazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angle v. Than, et al
as 14-1333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAD ANGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL T. THAN, STATE OF COLORADO, COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Javier-Lopez v. Bledsoe et al
as 4:2014cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carlos Javier-Lopez
Defendant:
Brian A. Bledsoe, A. Jones, P. Fredericks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Samuel Wilson v. Archer, et al
as 14-35085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL EARL WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARCHER, Sgt., ROBERTS, Lut., DEACON, Mr. and others
Walbrook v. Debnale et al
as 1:2014cv00299
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Blake, Captain V. Debnale, Officers John Doe 1 and 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv07788
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harris
Defendant:
The City of New York, Joan Ferreiar and John Does 1 through 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Owens et al
as 3:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Jose Morales, Larry Butts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall King v. Robert McCarty, et al
as 13-1769
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL KING
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCCARTY and JOHN DOES, #1 and #2
Best v. OMH PHS Discharge Planning - John Doe et al
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Defendant:
OMH PHS Discharge Planning - John Doe, John Doe 1 and 2, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
