Cases 21 - 30 of 949
Goshade v. Winningham et al
as 4:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Goshade
Defendant:
Joe Don Winningham, Will Jones, Karen D Whatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zamora v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Armando Zamora
Defendant:
Shane Jones and Nick Gault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Peterson et al
as 6:2023cv06116
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Jones
Defendant:
Rebekah Peterson, Benjamin Martin, Jason Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Peterson et al
as 4:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Jones
Defendant:
Rebekah Peterson, Benjamin Martin, Jason Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finley v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv06110
Plaintiff:
Jamie Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Officer Smith, Officer B. Rogburg, Sheriff Mike McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Arlen Ray Jones
Defendant:
Jail Administrator John or Jane Doe, Turn Key Medical, Captain Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Love et al
as 4:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Jesse R Jones
Defendant:
Janie Love, Karen Angerman, Crystal Stripling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denson v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Michael Denson
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackleford v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Donald Shackleford
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Gilliam et al
as 4:2023cv00993
Plaintiff:
Cedric Armond Mitchell
Defendant:
Wade Gilliam, Jones, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
