Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Dizzley v. Nelson
as 22-2072
Petitioner / Appellant:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Respondent / Appellee:
Kenneth Nelson
Justin Hillerby v. Kenneth Nelson
as 22-7088
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN HILLERBY
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH NELSON, Warden
Dizzley v. Nelson
as 1:2022cv04383
Petitioner:
Terron Gerhard Dizzley
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamble v. Nelson et al
as 4:2022cv02341
Plaintiff:
Charles Gamble and Charles Edward Gamble, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Warden Tonya James, Mr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stackhouse, Jr. v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv01863
Petitioner:
Edward W. Stackhouse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Nelson et al
as 8:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Dantlee A. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Cpt. Tony Vela, Major Kenneth Greggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Robert Wazney v. Ken Nelson
as 22-6500
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WILLIAM WAZNEY
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH NELSON, Warden, Individual and Official Capacities, RANDALL WILLIAMS, Regional Director, Individual and Official Capacities, ROSEANNE WILSON, Grievance Coordinator, Individual and Official Capacities and others
George Jones v. Kenneth Nelson
as 22-6382
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE A. JONES, a/k/a George Albert Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH NELSON, Warden
Cannon v. Nelson
as 1:2022cv01066
Petitioner:
Donetelle D. Cannon
Respondent:
Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Nelson
as 2:2022cv01032
Petitioner:
Doni Terrele Anderson
Respondent:
Mr. Kenneth Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
