Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Pitts v. Straugh et al
as 5:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, C Daniel, K Bolden and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Kelley
as 5:2019cv00162
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pitts v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00188
Defendant:
Davis Kelley, Jr, Broughton, Willie and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Gooly et al
as 5:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
J Gooly, Danny Burl and Marshall Dale Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Drummond et al
as 5:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Patrick S Drummond, William Benton, Roy Griffins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Pitts v. Pulaski County Circuit Court, et al
as 15-2219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
Pulaski County Circuit Court and Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Pitts v. Pulaski County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Pulaski County Circuit Court and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenneth Pitts v. Jacqueline Carswell, et al
as 14-2466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
Jacqueline Carswell, RPH, Tucker Maximum Unit, ADC, Sonya A. Pepper-Davis, Doctor, Tucker Maximum Unit, ADC, Alva M. McDowell, Health Service Supervisor, Tucker Maximum Unit, ADC and others
Kenneth Pitts v. Turner, et al
as 14-2172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant - Appellee:
Turner, Sergeant, Tucker Max Unit, ADC, Jackson, Corporal, Tucker Max Unit, ADC and Sowell, Sergeant, Tucker Max Unit, ADC
Pitts v. Williams et al
as 5:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Maurice E Williams, Billy W Straugh, Corey C Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
