Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Robinson v. Butler et al
as 7:2013cv00776
Petitioner:
Bobby Lorenzo Robinson
Respondent:
Freddy Butler and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mallory v. Hetzel et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv01011
Plaintiff:
Jacques G. Mallory
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Larry Anglin and Lorenzo Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Municipal Courts of Huntsville AL et al
as 5:2012cv03818
Petitioner:
Lorenzo L White
Respondent:
Municipal Courts of Huntsville AL and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leslie v. Greene et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Leslie
Defendant:
Lorenzo Greene and Dennis Durry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Forniss et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00848
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo K. Henry
Defendant:
Leon Forniss and Tracy Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainer v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2011cv00414
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Rainer
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Watkins v. Mitchem et al
as 5:2011cv01528
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Watkins
Defendant:
Billy Mitchem, Lloyd Wallace, Derwin Halbrooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Abston et al
as 7:2010cv02167
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Butler
Defendant:
David Abston and Tanya Rae
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakely v. Johnston et al
as 1:2010cv00026
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Edward Blakely
Defendant:
Joseph Johnston, Lars T. Granade, Pam Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Dinkins et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo E. Walker
Defendant:
T. Dinkins, F. Fenn, Mark Lowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
