Cases 21 - 30 of 2,138
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
(PC) Harper v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
Clayborne Williams and Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Mowery et al
as 4:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Antwyone Lynch
Defendant:
M. Mowery and A. Kuster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01609
Petitioner:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Respondent:
Julie Lynch, FRANCISCO LUTTECKE, Frederick D Benton, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruffin v. Wilhem et al
as 4:2024cv04059
Plaintiff:
Mwamba M Ruffin
Defendant:
Chase Wilhem, Mark N Williams, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01276
Petitioner:
Aldede Lynch
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv00980
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LUNSFORD v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2024cv04359
Plaintiff:
ERIC LUNSFORD
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, BARRINGTON LYNCH, DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiwaz v. Ceresini et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Miss Tiwaz, Sir Tiwaz, Cea Gleanbead Mai and others
Defendant:
Scott Ceresini, Captain Scott Bradley, Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iseli v. State of California et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Branden Willie Iseli
Defendant:
State of California, County of San Joaquin, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
