Cases 21 - 30 of 311
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13299
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wihly Harpo v. Robert Hunter, III, et al
as 23-12911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WIHLY HARPO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT W. HUNTER, III, CARLETTA SIMS-BROWN, VERA L. BUTLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00648
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Beltran (PS) v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Manuel E. Beltran
Defendant:
Gonzalez, Burserto PerFecto, District Attorney's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Jackson County, Mississippi
as 23-60405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob Blair Scott
Defendant / Appellee:
Jackson County, Mississippi, Mark Maples, Matthew Lott and others
Pagan v. Brogdon et al
as 3:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Lance R Pagan
Defendant:
David Brogdon, Derrick Meek, Gaston County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RODRIGUEZ v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION et al
as 3:2023cv16482
Plaintiff:
DARIO M RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION, BABECOCK, BAGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Latney v. Kramer Law Firm PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Dennis Latney
Defendant:
Kramer Law Firm PLLC, Edward Kramer and Beth Jordan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slayton v. Cheadle
as 23-20240
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelly Elaine Slayton
Defendant / Appellee:
William Kauper Cheadle, also known as Bill, Cheadle Law Firm, District Court Room 482 Judge Maritza Antu and others
Smith v. Conte Jail Facility et al
as 0:2023cv60820
Plaintiff:
Salinas Falun Smith
Defendant:
Conte Jail Facility, Salinas A. Smith, Salinas G. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
