Cases 21 - 30 of 110
THOMAS v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv04473
Petitioner:
DARRON THOMAS
Respondent:
SEAN MARLER, DEPUTY WARDEN LAWRY and FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VINES v. MARLER et al
as 2:2021cv01792
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, SEAN MARLER, ALEXIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD D. VINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rigsby v. Marler et al
as 5:2021cv00316
Defendant:
Doctor FNU Marler, Oklahoma State of, FNU LNU and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Rigsby, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SHAHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv01397
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN PETE LAWRIE, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
VACHO SHAHEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANDING v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv01115
Defendant:
UNKOWN BOP CORRECTION OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN SEAN MARLER, UNKNOWN BUEAU OF PRISONS MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAAL BLANDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkerson et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Mark Nooth, John Doe 3, Kate Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Edwards, Nolan James Dabell, William J. Parkerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marler (ID 91974) v. Langford
as 5:2020cv03247
Petitioner:
Randy Allen Marler
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HILLER v. SOGO et al
as 2:2020cv04445
Defendant:
A. SOGO, SEAN MARLER, LIEUTENANT CASTILLO and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TILLMAN v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04101
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, RAEPH LAUGHINGWELL, ELIZABETH SHERNECKE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. TILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ-COLON v. MARLER et al
as 2:2020cv04083
Plaintiff:
FERNANDINO RODRIGUEZ-COLON
Defendant:
SEAN MARLER, N. MANSI, J. O'BOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
