Cases 21 - 30 of 70
v. VEREEN et al
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
BILAL RASUL
Defendant:
DARREN VEREEN, SPEPHEN OJO, TIMOTHY CISCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Wright v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2022ct03211
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Wright, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth E. Lassiter, Todd E. Ishee, Shelia Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Bond
as 1:2022cv00129
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Bonds
as 1:2022cv00127
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pickens v. Bonds
as 1:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Brandon Pickens
Respondent:
Monica Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Eason v. Raymond Bailey
as 22-6547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES F. EASON
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND BAILEY, KIRBY SANDERSON, GEORGE W. BAYSDEN, JR. and others
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
