Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Jose Espinoza v. Debbie Asuncion, et al
as 17-16939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE JUAN ESPINOZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden, N. WALKER, Correctional Captain, L. M. PENNISI, Jr., Correctional Lieutenant and others
Hatches v. Cipollini et al
as 7:2017cv06053
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hatches
Defendant:
T. Cipollini, L. Nichols, C.O. Preston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 17-2596
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, GUY GROOT, JUDITH ROTH and others
Parks v. Sebastian County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2017cv02047
Plaintiff:
Terry Eugene Parks
Defendant:
Sebastian County, Arkansas , William Hollenbeck , David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCraw v. Grounds et al
as 3:2016cv07010
Plaintiff:
Travion A McCraw
Defendant:
R Grounds, J. Aboytes, G.R. Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. James Clayton, et al
as 16-2898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES C. CLAYTON, Investigator/Internal Affairs and RYAN KERR, Security Therapist Aid
Espinoza v. Asuncion et al
as 3:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Espinoza
Defendant:
D. Asuncion, N. Walker, L. Pennisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie Walker, Sr. v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 16-1472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE N. WALKER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHAN JUMPER, Clinical Director, (Liberty Healthcare employee), GUY GROOT, Team Leader (Liberty Healthcare employee), JUDITH ROTH, Clinical Therapist (Liberty Healthcare employee) and others
Walker v. Scott
as 4:2016cv04021
Petitioner:
Frankie N. Walker, Jr.
Respondent:
Greggory Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04009
Plaintiff:
Frankie N Walker, Sr
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg Scott, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
