Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Harrod v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv02011
Petitioner:
James Cornell Harrod
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and James O'Neil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis# 195873 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2016cv01747
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Dixon, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comier v. O'Neil et al
as 2:2016cv01584
Petitioner:
Lee Comier, Jr.
Respondent:
James O'Neil and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis #195873 v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 2:2016cv01377
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly #137699 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Aaron Dwayne Kelly
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, J O'Neil, J Van Winkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordnattaz #189558 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv01167
Plaintiff:
Mack Gordnattaz
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, James Brown, Mike Linderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coronado #126014 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jaime R Coronado
Defendant:
Charles Ryan, C Hawley, James O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green #275635 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00454
Petitioner:
Anthony Roman Green
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and J O'Neil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parks v. Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00083
Plaintiff:
Edward F Parks
Defendant:
Christy Denise Johnson, Neil Robert Taylor, Bull Head Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sebert v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00354
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections , Corizon Health Incorporated , Corizon Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Asia Lynn Sebert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
