Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Mumin v. Condon et al
as 8:2019cv00060
Defendant:
Patrick Condon and Doug Peterson
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Journey v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00038
Defendant:
Nebraska Mental Health Board, Cathy Sheair, Richard Beecher and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Journey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epp v. Frakes et al
as 8:2018cv00418
Plaintiff:
William Epp
Defendant:
Scott Busboom, Brian Gage, Scott Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2018cv03056
Defendant:
Scott R. Frakes, Nathan A. Liss, Rebecca A. McClung and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Jennings, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Peterson
as 8:2018cv00124
Petitioner:
Craig A. Johnson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Douglas J. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yanga v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2018cv00089
Respondent:
Scott Frakes, Madsen and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General and Douglas Peterson
Petitioner:
Emmanuel S. Yanga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Davis et al
as 4:2017cv03137
Defendant:
Michelle Capps, Salvador Cruz, Magen Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyler v. Bride et al
as 4:2017cv03057
Defendant:
G. Bride, David Lopez, Douglas Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumin v. Frakes et al
as 4:2017cv03032
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Epp et al v. Frakes et al
as 4:2016cv03176
Defendant:
Todd Bahensky, Steena Beltz, Valorie Benedixen and others
Plaintiff:
William Epp and Dukhan Mumin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
