Cases 21 - 30 of 103
May v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2020cv00167
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Phillip Darryl May
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Phillips v. Turner et al
as 4:2020cv00006
Petitioner:
Marshall Phillips
Respondent:
Marshall Turner and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Amos et al v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wilson, Charles Gayles, Phillip Decarlos Webster and others
Defendant:
Pelicia E. Hall, Marshal Turner and Tommy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alvarez v. McAleenan et al
as 5:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Matthew Albence, U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, SHAWN GILLIS and others
Plaintiff:
Josep Ramirez Alvarez
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tedder v. Banks et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
Warden Wendell Banks, Officer Gary, Captain Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
William Phillip Tedder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Phillips v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00384
Plaintiff:
Marshall Phillips
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dorthy Johnson and Pelicia Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Hall et al
as 3:2018cv00701
Defendant:
Dorothy Johnson and Pelicia Hall
Plaintiff:
Marshall Phillips
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Williams et al
as 4:2018cv00014
Plaintiff:
Marshall Phillips
Defendant:
Kevin Williams and Ora Starks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Stevens et al
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stephen Phillips
Defendant:
Gloria Stevens, Randy Johnson, Sheriff Dept. Jasper County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00294
Plaintiff:
Thomas Phillip Green
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Unknown Moore, MTC/EMCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
