Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Larry Flynt v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1187
Movant - Appellant:
Larry C. Flynt
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Allen Nicklasson v. George Lombardi, et al
as 13-3664
Plaintiff:
David Zink, Michael S. Worthington, John E. Winfield and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Allen L. Nicklasson
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, David R. Dormire, Terry Russell and others
Larry Ferguson v. Ray Hobb
as 13-3099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry R. Ferguson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, III
Defendant:
S Bradford, R Ferguson, Moates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tierney v. Deputy R. Ferguson et al
as 8:2013cv01684
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Tierney
Defendant:
Deputy R. Ferguson and Deputy P. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Mrs Bradford, Ms Hagerman, R Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zink et al v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2012cv04209
Plaintiff:
David Zink , Michael Worthington , John E. Winfield and others
Defendant:
George A. Lombardi , David R. Dormire , Terry Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Larry Ferguson v. Ray Hobb
as 12-2690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Larry R. Ferguson
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Zimmerman v. Ferguson
as 6:2012cv01023
Plaintiff:
Jason Cornelius Zimmerman
Defendant:
Shaun R. Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Hobbs
as 5:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
Larry R Ferguson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
