Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Reid et al
as 3:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
David Reid, Willis Fowler, J. Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Sigmon
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
FNU Sigmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Harven A. Crouse Detention Center et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gene Scott
Defendant:
Harven A. Crouse Detention Center, Bill Beam, Vida Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lentz v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
Shelby Reid Lentz
Defendant:
FNU Honeycutt, FNU Dye and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03238
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Sheriff Larry Pierce, Major Thaxton, Capt. Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022ct03178
Plaintiff:
Sidney Lide Rogers
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Warden Morris G. Reid and Dr. Brian B. Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Dennison
as 5:2022ct03158
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
Nurse Dennison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2022ct03050
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jarrod Johnson
Defendant:
Shanticia E. Hawkins, Shirley Bennett, Barbra Watson Hargrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
