Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Michael Samuelson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-11269
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN SAMUELSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Samuelson v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2012cv03019
Plaintiff:
Steven Scott Samuelson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Itasca, County of, Jon Maturi and others
Samuelson v. Spearman
as 3:2012cv02577
Petitioner:
Howard R. Samuelson
Respondent:
M. Spearman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Samuelson v. Rick Thaler, Director, et al
as 12-51047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN SAMUELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, JONI WHITE, Director of Classifications, T.D.C.J., MRS. BUCKNER, Byrd Unit - T.D.C.J. Classifications and others
Steven Samuelson v. Tom Roy
as 12-2051
Petitioner - Appellant:
Steven Scott Samuelson
Respondent - Appellee:
Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections for the State of Minnesota
Melendez v. Costello et al
as 6:2012cv06226
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
Costello, P. Foley, Karlstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Ludeman et al
as 0:2012cv00440
Plaintiff:
Russell Norton
Defendant:
Cal R. Ludeman, Lucinda Jesson, Dennis Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuelson v. Roy
as 0:2012cv00409
Petitioner:
Steven Scott Samuelson
Respondent:
Tom Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Samuelson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2012cv00299
Petitioner:
Michael Dean Samuelson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Tan et al
as 6:2011cv06614
Plaintiff:
John C. Kelly
Defendant:
Dr J Tan, MD, Dr Koenigsmann, MD, Prov. Robert Ciepielia, POD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
