Cases 21 - 30 of 66
Guillette v. Burlington Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00171
Defendant:
South Burlington Police Department, Burlington Police Department and State of Vermont
Plaintiff:
Sean E. Guillette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Robert Demos et al v. The State Attorney General of California et al
as 2:2019cv08043
Defendant:
The Governor of The State of California, The Governor of The State of South Dakota, The Virginia Company and others
Plaintiff:
John R Demos, Jr., The Society of T.R.U.T.H. and John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Touchette et al
as 2:2019cv00151
Defendant:
Doug Densmore, Michael Touchette, Tyler Bixter and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights Vermont v. Department of Children and Families et al
as 5:2019cv00106
Defendant:
Ken Schatz, Department of Children and Families, Jay Simons and others
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Vermont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russin v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Mike Touchette, Greg Hale, Matt Brouillette and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Russin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. State of Vermont
as 18-817
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bahji Adams
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Vermont and State of Georgia
Fellows v. Vermont
as 5:2017cv00187
Petitioner:
Frank W. Fellows
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. State of Vermont et al
as 2:2017cv00114
Petitioner:
Bahji Adams
Respondent:
State of Vermont and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chandler v. State of Vermont
as 17-1129
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Chandler
Respondent - Appellee:
State of Vermont and William H. Sorrell, Attorney General, State of Vermont
Hicks v. Orleans County State's Attorney
as 5:2017cv00039
Petitioner:
James E. Hicks, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Vermont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
