Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Gibson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03773
Petitioner:
Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibson #181293 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03763
Petitioner:
Eric Shaw Gibson
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Arpaio
as 2:2017cv01573
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff:
Brandon Christopher Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zotika v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08297
Plaintiff:
Patrick J Zotika
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Scott Marquardt, Odie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodrigues v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08272
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Rodrigues
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, R Scott Marquardt, Odie Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alsaud #108844 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaykh Muhammad Abdul Aziz Khalid Bin Talal Alsaud
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, S Ibarra, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atwood #062887 v. Ibarra et al
as 2:2016cv00366
Plaintiff:
Frank Jarvis Atwood
Defendant:
Staci Ibarra, Unknown Shaw, Mark Huggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson #117045 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2014cv01095
Plaintiff:
Barry Northcross Patterson
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections, GEO Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramirez #262582 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ramirez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Corizon Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schweder v. Shaw et al
as 2:2013cv02139
Plaintiff:
Jon Anthony Schweder
Defendant:
J Shaw, C Valtierra, Sandra Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
