Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stith v. Saul
as 7:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Justin Anthony Lewis Stith
Defendant:
Sgt. J.D. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Firewalker-Fields v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7769
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID NIGHTHORSE FIREWALKER-FIELDS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, sued Individually and Official Capacity and IVAN GILMORE, Warden
Defendant:
E. WITT, Grievance Coordinator and Ombudsman Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, SGT. RIDDICK, Night Sergeant Housing 2 Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity, ISRAEL HAMILTON, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, sued Individually and Official Capacity and others
Stith v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2021cv00520
Petitioner:
Derrick Wayne Stith, Sr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Stith
as 1:2021cv02472
Plaintiff:
Julius Elmo Montgomery
Defendant:
Liquori Stith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stith v. Aspan
as 4:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wayne Stith
Defendant:
Brian T Aspan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Stith v. Darlene et al
as 2:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Defendant:
Secretary Darlene, Simmons and Darlene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Stith v. Johnson
as 4:2021cv00171
Petitioner:
Chloe Louise Stith
Respondent:
Clayton Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carter v. Stith et al
as 1:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Lt. Knight, A Sykes, Miranda Stith and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin F Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
