Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Tennison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2014cv00827
Petitioner:
Nimoy Alejandro Tennison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennison v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00704
Petitioner:
Nimoy Alejandro Tennison
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Adams v. C. Gibson, et al
as 14-15734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. GIBSON, Warden, Correctional Officer, C. TENNISON, A. J. MALFI, Warden, Folsom State Prison and others
TENNISON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2013cv07609
Plaintiff:
BLAKE TENNISON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tennison v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv01723
Plaintiff:
Blake R Tennison
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tennison v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv01417
Petitioner:
Dale Dean Tennison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ronald Adams v. C. Gibson, et al
as 12-16572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. GIBSON, Warden, A. J. MALFI, Warden, Folsom State Prison, C. TENNISON, Correctional Officer and others
James Tennison v. Joe Minix, et al
as 11-17087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FREEMAN TENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE MINIX, (ASU 293), inmate in Santa Rita County Jail and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, ALAMEDA CO. JAIL
Bryan Ransom v. M. Johnson, et al
as 11-16157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
M. JOHNSON, G. LILLY, B. ESPINOZA and others
Tennison-v-Minix et.al.
as 4:2011cv01718
Plaintiff:
James Freeman Tennison
Defendant:
Joe Minix and Prison Health Services, Alameda Co. Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
