Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Marino v. Sherrod et al
as 1:2010cv01413
Plaintiff:
Vincent Michael Marino
Defendant:
W A Sherrod, Jodi Wampler, USP - Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benitez v. Justice et al
as 1:2010cv01282
Plaintiff:
Efrain Benitez
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice and Janice Galli McLeod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Justice et al
as 2:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Howard Mack Harris
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Joe P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01189
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Probation, U S Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Huff v. U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division
as 3:2008cv00516
Petitioner:
Johnny R. Huff
Respondent:
U. S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jennings v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv01190
Plaintiff:
Troy Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U S Dept Probation, U S Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Moore v. Justice et al
as 1:2008cv01112
Plaintiff:
David L Moore
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Warden Menafee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bryson v. Keffer et al
as 1:2008cv00960
Plaintiff:
William M Bryson, Jr
Defendant:
Joe Keffer, U S Attorney Executive Office and U S Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Colley v. U. S. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2007cv02515
Plaintiff:
Terry Jerome Colley
Defendant:
U. S. Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
