Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Rothman v. Lombardi et al
as 4:2011cv00639
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Rothman
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Joe Hoffmeister, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Steele
as 4:2010cv00758
Petitioner:
Kenneth Webb
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Larkins et al
as 4:2010cv00629
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, William Vallier, Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones-El v. Webster et al
as 2:2010cv04058
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
David Webster, Dave Courm, Edward L Ruppel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCranie et al v. Larkins et al
as 4:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
Willie McCranie and Eugene Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Steve Larkins, William Vallier, Larry Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones-El v. Dormire et al
as 2:2009cv04255
Plaintiff:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Billy Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rothman v. Chastin et al
as 4:2009cv01895
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Rothman
Defendant:
Unknown Chastin, Unknown Webb, Bubble Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2009cv04198
Plaintiff:
Andre Porter
Defendant:
George A Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Hakala et al
as 4:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Martin Akeem Daniel
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Larry Crawford, Steve Larkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Webb v. United States of America
as 4:2008cv01510
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Webb
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
