Cases 31 - 40 of 356
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, J Macadorey, D Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Freeman
Defendant:
David Shinn, Norman Twyford, Unknown MacAdorey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01182
Petitioner:
Victor Manuel Hernandez
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
W Walker, Martha Dominguez, Unknown Russom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of
as 2:2022cv01120
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Leon N Wilmot, Robert Arriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lerma #80531 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00919
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Lerma
Defendant:
David Shinn, Charles Ryan, Unknown Shivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kristich v. Rios et al
as 4:2022cv00174
Petitioner:
Orin Kristich
Respondent:
Melisa Rios, Unknown Party, Unknown Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
Yuma, County of, Bianca Acosta, Julian Aguayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seneca #113423 v. Koeppel et al
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Kristofer Michael Seneca
Defendant:
Cynthia M Koeppel, Quinn Harvey, Alfred Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Howard
as 4:2021cv00541
Petitioner:
Joaquin Mendez Hernandez
Respondent:
Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
