Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Rodriguez v. Providence Police Department, et al
as 12-1230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN KENNEDY, MARTIN HAMES and others
Hugo Rodriguez v. USA, et al
as 11-50896
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGO ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Rodriguez v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00036
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security, US Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Hugo Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rudy Rodriguez v. USA
as 11-11185
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDY ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rodriguez v. US
as 11-1132
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Hugo Rodriguez v. USA, et al
as 10-51229
Petitioner - Appellant:
HUGO ALBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Rodriguez v. Wells
as 3:2010cv00095
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Walt Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. United States of Amercia et al
as 4:2010cv00089
Respondent:
Bureau Of Prisons, U.S. Attorney General, United States of Amercia and others
Petitioner:
Hugo Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. Justice
as 1:2010cv00048
Petitioner:
Rudy Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv20586
Plaintiff:
Rudy Alberto Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
