Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Griffin v. Jones, et al
as 2:2015cv01959
Plaintiff:
Clorenzo Mack Griffin
Defendant:
Scott Jones, Andris and Mattoon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Falk et al
as 2:2015cv00673
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Falk, O'Brien, Andris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jones v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2015cv00680
Defendant:
Sacramento, County of Sacramento, Scott Jones and others
Plaintiff:
(PC) Jones and Walter Olin Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mehmood v. Andris et al
as 2:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Andris, Massa, Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danielson-Grodin, et al v. Raemisch, et al
as 1:2014cv02704
Plaintiff:
Mary Danielson-Grodin, Matt Lincoln, John Demming and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Lou Archuleta, SCF Mailroom, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. U.S. Marshals Service et al
as 2:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service, Sacramento County Main Jail Superintendent, Terry Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mehmood v. Andris, et al.
as 2:2014cv01613
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Defendant:
Andris, U.S. Marshal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritte et al v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv09331
Plaintiff:
Calvin Merritte, Stanley Donahue, Darryl Gullens and others
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Salvador Godinez, Michael Lemke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinegal v. Dixon Correctional Institute
as 6:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Andris Sinegal, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Dixon Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sinegal v. Dixon Correctional Institute
as 5:2013cv03004
Plaintiff:
Andris Sinegal, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Dixon Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
