Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Grethen v. Clarke et al
as 2:2013cv00416
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Grethen
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Gene M. Johnson, John Jabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. Gacad et al
as 3:2013cv01375
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Belton, Sr.
Defendant:
Joy Gacad, Marie Koludrovic, K. Seibel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hankins v. Boehm
as 7:2012cv00297
Defendant:
David Boehm
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanna v. Mariposa County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2012cv00501
Plaintiff:
Richard Charles Hanna
Defendant:
Mariposa County Sheriff Dept., Boehm, Rumfelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farabee v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00176
Plaintiff:
Brian Farabee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, James W. Stewart, III, David Boehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farabee v. Clarke, et al
as 2:2012cv00177
Plaintiff:
Brian Farabee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, David Boehm, James W. Stewart, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2012cv00071
Plaintiff:
Andrew Taylor
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Van Hinton, Hamilton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Boehm
as 1:2011cv01015
Petitioner:
Kenya Basil Parker
Respondent:
David Boehm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cross v. King County Executive et al
as 2:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
William Hardee Cross
Defendant:
King County Executive, Dow Constantine, Van Olst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farabee v. Johnson et al
as 2:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brian Farabee
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Commissioner of the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation & Substance Abuse Services (DMHMRSAS), Dr. John Bench and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
